This is a story I have told before and no doubt will tell again elsewhere but it shows the way something trivial can have layers of meaning.
Many, moons ago, I was sitting in a classroom in Westminster college when the tutor (not a member of Westminster staff) opinined that the reason we got heated debates over the colour of church padlocks is that people felt that they were qualified to have an opinion about that.
I came back and happened to recount the story to my minister. She then recalled a heated church meeting of several years ago where one senior member got up to complain that the guttering was not painted Presbyterian Blue any more. In other words the choice of colour of padlock on the church gate might well be a sign of identity.
However what colour was Presbyterian blue, well as far as I can tell it is a light shade of Royal Blue. Well it is a highly political statement
The blue and buff of the whigs of the present day probably derive their origin from the Presbtyerian blue and orange favours, which were worn at the time of the Revolution to commemorate the deliverance by the wisdom and valour of the Prince of Orange
This is a foot note from Hudibras: a poem, Volume 2 By Samuel Butler, Zachary Grey, John Heaviside Clar.
Now lets start un picking that. Presbyterian blue symbolises both loyalty to the Protestant monarchy or maybe both monarchist and protestant.If we take the Whig reference, where they seem to have stuck with the orange or buff with their golden bird (hang on is that Presbyterian Blue in the border?) yet non-conformity particularly Presbyterianism and Congregationalism have stuck with the blue.
In a very short while I have taken you a long way from the debate over padlocks. Does the colour matter? If so what level of symbolism matters? Are we being loyal to the Protestant Monarchy? Or signalling we are Reformed? or do we just like Presbyterian blue because it is the colour we always use?
